Knowing An Organization’s Data Management Maturity Promotes Effective Open Data Program Planning

-

 By Dennis D. McDonald, Ph.D



Hearing about an open data program like the EPA's makes you realize how the many interrelated program components can impact open data program planning in a complex organization. Inventorying the assets of such an organization makes you aware of this very quickly, especially when you step back and evaluate where each data element in the inventory came from, where each data element is going, and how it's going to get there.


Each data element in a data asset inventory has its own "lifecycle" that when properly managed provides a framework for tracking and optimizing how data are used from creation through obsolescence.


In most cases data are managed in groups. Data groupings can be defined in a myriad of ways. Some approaches reflect how data are physically organized. Other groupings involve development different categories of metadata that have been standardized for use across different data sets. An example of the latter is shown in India’s Data.gov under the heading Controlled Vocabulary Services. This lists, for example, both XML and JSON tagging for categories such as the languages spoken in India.


The main point of this is that different organizations possess different levels of “data management maturity," or DMM as it is referred to by some. Knowing what level of maturity an organization possesses with regard to data management is something open data program planners should be aware of for one simple reason: effective process change management.


Open data programs, even if they require little in the way of technology change, require some changes to an organization's business processes both inside and outside the IT department.


Anticipating what these process changes will be, and how the organization is already structured for managing such changes, will be a prerequisite for effective open data program planning. Knowing this maturity level will help the planner understand how much can -- and cannot -- be taken for granted when developing an open data program development plan and implementation schedule.


Related reading:


Challenges of Public-Private Interfaces in Open Data and Big Data Partnerships

Compendium: My Guest Posts for the BaleFire Global Open Data Blog

Don’t Let Tools Drive Enterprise Data Strategy

Justifying Collaboration in Complex Programs such as Federal Acquisitions

Mitigation of Sequestration Impacts on Project Management

On Defining the "Maturity" of Open Data Programs

Planning for Big Data: Lessons Learned from Large Energy Utility Projects

Promoting Technology Enabled Collaboration in Complex R&D Environments

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Podcast: Open Data Discussions with Anthony Fung

-
Image
A look back at Virginia’s 4 years of data innovation with Anthony Fung, Deputy Secretary of Technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia  Welcome to the OpenDataSoft Leadership Podcast Series, “Open Data Discussions”. Each month, Jason Hare, our Open Data Evangelist, features a different open data program around the country to discuss what has made it successful. These examples will provide insights and strategies that you can implement in your own city. We had the pleasure of welcoming Anthony Fung, Deputy Secretary of Technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia for the fifth podcast in our series. Anthony discussed various subjects, including: What role does open data play in policymaking at the state level in Virginia? Does his department work on ensuring open data quality? What are some of the steps he makes in ensuring sound data governance? How did Virginia come up with this technology and engagement solutions?  How, for exampl...
Read more

WHITE HOUSE OPEN DATA INNOVATION SUMMIT - WHAT I SAID, WHAT I MEANT TO SAY

-
Image
+OpenDataSoft participated in the celebration that was 8 years in the making at the White House. Yesterday, for the first time, the White House held the 2016 Open Data Innovation Summit.  I work for OpenDataSoft as the Open Data Evangelist. I was asked to introduce the White House Agenda and then to speak on Civic Innovation regarding Open Data. What I said and what I wanted to say were different. The event was full of excitement and also of reflection Megan Smith and Tony Scott kicked off the event touting the 200k datasets that had been released through Data.Gov. Certainly this is refreshing from even a decade ago when serious effort and even lawsuits were required to make data available to the public. That all was not good and could be better was brought up by +Alex Howard from the Sunlight Foundation. Alex noted that HTML and PDFs were counted among the "datasets" being released. Note that while HTML and PDFs are indeed 1 star ...
Read more

Open Data Licensing

-
Image
Everything you wanted to know but you were afraid to ask. Making data open and available is not just about choosing a format or having an API. A poor choice in your license can prevent people from using them. A traditional open license reassures potential users that their work on the data will be useful in the long run. So, what license should you pick for your data to be broadly used? There are a few things to consider. Choosing a license for your open data can usually be one of the biggest challenges for an open data project. There are plenty of licenses available for your data. Choosing one mostly depends on the usage and reach you want to give to your project. CHOOSE A LICENSE: BASED ON NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL AND LOCAL STATUTES IN ADDITION TO REUSE It should be noted that different parts of the world use data licensing terms differently. In the US, works in the “public domain” are works are not covered by intellectual property rights, such as copyright. The copyright mig...
Read more